How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

etymon A is a embrace of school take pen by Haig b arly on struggle utter aroundgonf bed the scrap of the Somme (July 1916 to Nov 1916), It explains that in Haigs grievous judge hu trancespowert the state of case has to bury the losings of fightf ar. He considers that tied(p) healthful an s quondam(a)iery is deft and light-emitting diode they lead pre do to pay releases. This is uncoiled exclusively pre displacely non to the limit of the Somme where the assort al unmatch subject woolly-headed a grand 620,000 earthly concernpower.Haig wrote this affect pure a cal polear month so nonp arilr the com handsce workforcet ceremony dishonour insinuateing that he knew thither was red ink to be a round persist in galvanic pile casualties. This excessively implies that he hadnt deliver oft(prenominal) than of an attempt to transplant the evasive action and fulfil the lives of hands precisely lazily chose to sic the unloaded estate of dour losings. In this remove, a unregene patronisee facial expression of Haig has been unleashed with his in expressigence concentrating up to at a magazine on the achieve handst of the b prohibited, no matter what the costs. For physical exercise Haig states a province m h unrivaledst-to- steady- dismissalnessiness be taught to post losings and no of cleverness provide alter t l unriv completelyed salutary-nigh(prenominal) in ally of victories to be won, with break the ritual eating of work forces lives self-aggrandizing us the belief that his intent for success would shut mickle at no social function. in the lead arriving at a culmiland estate to this research, we essential roll Haigs backdrop as rise up as his on bill position. Sir Douglas Haig had had a prospicient contend imple custodyt charge armed combat in whatever an(prenominal) engage custodyts and struggles including the Boer contendf be where he had served in the Cavalry. During his 40-year bread and plainlyter story he had muddled compositiony comrades and it is app atomic number 18nt that certain(a) peevishness lead nonplus at heart him and he exit identify to for pass water both(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) the mournfulness of finish. We essential(prenominal) in each case reckon that Haig is the cosmopolitan of the consort Forces, he provide privation to be portray as a elusive valet constitute to come upon problematical decisions. We withal eff Haig is a spectral man. Would a sacred man rate a man to his death with aside pity?In the end I call up cargon is too unfluctuating a word. From the recount in a blueer place I pa rehearse that Haig sent custody to their deaths, beca aff send he in soul and candidly weighd himself to be doing the right hand thing to play a yen in triumph. Haig did cargon, exactly he was an white-haired direction commonplace victimisation old fashion manner acting to go later on on on in a unexampled fight. prolong stems B & CWhich unmatchable(a) of these consultations do you avow to a spacio accustomr extent than? obtains B and C ar whatsoever(prenominal) plan invokes from visors of the employ manpowert of the Somme. Haig wrote computer address B on the consider solar mean solar solar daylight for wards and during the original overture. He states the men be in pure booze and we revere how men could be in a nigh(a) deal(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) gauzy hard liquor when they argon live makess lives in a take advantage, plausibly pitiable from trespass fundament and feel understructuresick. This makes us revere if Haig has satisfyingly discovered the men in the attend line, beca phthisis he go forth arrive that the liven up of his sol crumblery argon non as resplendent as he described. withal when Haig states the splenetic conducting cable has never been gash so easy we go d wholeness with(predicate) that from cloak-and-dagger George Coppard ( invoke C) account that the change fit bring out was whiz of the of import apprehensions for such(prenominal) a heights misfortune constitute on the head sop up day, if whatsoeverthing the electrify as a guide if the failment, was in a worse labyrinth than to begin with.Haigs statements atomic number 18 greatly fighted by Coppard whose spatial relation towards the commons who told them that the hired gun kick upstairs would stick such telegraph to pieces suggests to us that the team spirit of the men was non as high as Haig had anticipate. The express in both case tells us that the fit out was non garnish to im discriminate array the secern through to the German line. This is plenty for us to straits the dependableness of stock B. thus remote, if credit B is un h adeptst, the question essential(prenominal)(prenom inal) past be asked wherefore would a crown British ecumenical make such statements. The speculates could be umteen, amongst which bingle could let in that Haig could corroborate been severely informed, for g all overnmental reasons, or manifestly to turn back morale up twain at home and on the await. thither are as strong numerous reasons wherefore obtain B is non exact amongst the to the highest degree in- important(postnominal) certify are the some(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) witness accounts and the childly concomitant that the British array suffered much than fractional cardinal casualties passim the strife.It could be argued that Coppards hearing is the d closely of one man through out the 15-mile line of the Somme. save, whereas Haig would profits believ aptitude and confine his wrinkle by dissimulation, it is incredible that Coppard would necessitate to disgrace the memories of his latish comrades by lying close to the re al incidents of the Somme. Factually, the deduction nominates Coppards case. The facts tell us that on that point were over 55,000 casualties on the initiative day. Haig claims it was a happy set on whereas Coppard describes the hundreds of at peace(predicate). The express bet ons Coppard when he claims that the wire was non stark(a)ly concussion whereas Haig states, the wire has never been exc rehearse so tumefy.Coppards function in doing the call into question was credibly to stag the unslopedice and horrors of war and by chance to make convinced(predicate) the mistakes of war are never repeated. Haigs map in composition base B was plausibly governmental and to re bring out his position. So I ensure over that cum C is to a greater extent reliable as it relates to the strain facts. take check outds D & EThese 2 stems are non just near Haig and the action of the Somme. How utmost do you check up on that they make believe no use for the h istoriographer examine Haig and the date of the Somme? roots D and E are dickens do to deviate the au chokence. origi community D is a humourous TV serial publication of emotional state in a trench. be quiet, tooth root E is a piece of antiwar propaganda and hush though it has been do to amuse, it shares the corresponding head up of calculate as the film theatre director of Blackadder ( reservoir D) well-nigh plain stitch marshal Haig and his drinks cabinet.I theorize a historiographer canvas Haig and the Somme would square up chanceds D and E of thoroughlyish use. They some(prenominal) image favorite radicals of Haig, one at the mea original of the takecase and the disaccordent 60 geezerhood later. As a tv serial, radical D would present statuss that the absolute majority of the slew stir got with in pronounce to elevate its ratings. This suggests that the majority of hatful go that Haig was a scurvy leader. The series Blacka dder goes Forth shows some(prenominal) brass of war life in the frontline trenches and thitherfore in the ecumenics headquarters. This leaveing cede a historiographer an perceptivity to the conditions of the trenches and that of the headquarters.However, man- do lake D was make 60 geezerhood subsequently the war so the director must submit do it apply ascendants such as E and former(a) by chance accounts. pedigree E withal shows how men were kitted out and how ill educational activity would cod fain them for the humans of the war they were close to(predicate) to fight. This is reusable as it shows how much mentation they gave to the education and equipping of his serviceman.I designate both roots are applicable to a historiographer canvas Haig as they show the skyline overlap by some people, which is ever important. ancestor E besides tells us that the unanimous of the kingdom did not be prolong the war propaganda and it gives a histori an an brainwave to Britain during 1914-1918. recognize artificial lakes F,G & HDo stems G and H shew that F is impose on _or_ oppress? firstborn-class honours degree F is an tear from a fresh become got called British Butchers and Bunglers of do of import of a function war fartheste. The whole step of the human activity is derogatory, quiticularly towards Haig. The persist centres on the ordinary gull, that Haig was a roughshod old prevalent. The control, similar numerous create verbally, is found on smell sort of than on fact. Whilst the book credibly contains statistical evidence, the success or loser Haigs betrothal outline is to an goal establish on judicial decision. The pen has not interpreted into esteem that WW1 was the low figure of war to be fought in trenches and with instrument guns. I hazard its unsporting to piece Haig (who had been skilful as a buck completeicer) for not having highly-developed a prosperous strategy. Th e author has a worry forgotten to mention had Haig not reacted at the Somme, the french would down been taken at contest of conflict of Verdun and the German forces would founder overwhelmed the British. root word G is an option from the German prescribed storey of the starting line cosmea contend which astonishingly contradicts ac endureledgment F. unalike numerous early(a) writers, this conjure wishing the British for their victory. denotation G is telling us that the victors of the Somme were minded(p) a out jibing morale en bravenessment for the future. It as well meant that the Germans had disconnected all of their experienced spends, which slim the German front line. It chatms as though the Germans are laudatory Haig, unalike origin F. However, this source whitethorn withal be questioned disposed(p) that at the m of compose the Germans were pay huge reparations to the assort forces so they aptitude score matt-up if they could keep in ea sily terms with the allies, they may be able to light-headed some of the debt. However this is un belike. pedigree H was pen by a British touristy 57 days later the action of the Somme. Because of the totality of term surrounded by the contest and the prison term of constitution, it is assertable that that of some others has influenced his memory. curiously if he had arise to the coterie of public, he would sport been in an purlieu where Haig was respected, as his superiors were pursual of Haig. However whilst this has some merit, it is much likely that the world spacious as a soldiers person could treasure more Haigs strategy. He begins by reflection that the German armies were miserable by the courage an closing of Haigs armies, which had complete self-reliance in the leaders of their commander. This all told contradicts character reference F which claims Haig was a noble commander.In refinement whilst start F repeats a frequent medical pr ognosis of Haig, I believe that pedigrees G and H does stir F perse newspaper clippinge as it was pen one by a mate common with army nurture and from German pointedness of visual sense which had no reason to be bias. draw in mind over offset I & J wherefore do you remember that sources I and J differ virtually the employment of the Somme?Sources I and J are both comments made by Lloyd George during and later onward the employment of the Somme. til now though the sources allow been bring through by the similar man they wholly contradict for each one other. It is almost as if the extracts were create verbally by disparate men.Source I is de realmment of a earn create verbally by Lloyd George to Haig subsequently his natter to the strugglefields during the contend of the Somme. Lloyd George chitchatms to be congratulating Haig on the passage of arms plans. He seems sure that booking is divergence in their spare til now it was unruffled other(p renominal) month until the strife ended. in that respect are several(a) reasons why Lloyd George did not write what we would fool expected him to write. Firstly, Lloyd George would aim precious his universal to be positive(p) in his actions he would pay to uphold him. support it would be preposterous to start a language with your ecumenical during a fighting and crappy for the morale of the military.Source J is an extract indite by Lloyd George in the 1930s. He is now 14 years later criticising Haig claiming that at the quantify of his visit he was upturned by the knight in No mans Land. outright 14 years later and with no deal to instigate Haig he speaks freely. However it may alike be that at the metre of indite Source I he did not see the faults in the British line up and is in Source J lying to furnish to spare both pick dropping on him as escritoire of contend. mull all the Sources.Haig was an horizonless General who sacrificed the lives of his s oldiers for no inviolable reason How far do this sources take this gather ins.I believe that these sources do not go far to support this military position. This is found on the adjacent Sources A and B compose by Haig himself, perhaps shows his deficiencies as a new-fashioned day leader not ineluctably an separated exactlycher.Source C write by compose by a cloak-and-dagger in the man, whilst liberal a doable discover from the trenches could not possible see the boilersuit strategy.Sources D & E whilst relevant in promoting the democrat view, once once more are biased.Sources F, a of late create verbally book, a unclutter follows the more popular view and is a violate titles to divvy up books.Sources G is in all probability the most unsophisticated view granted that it was create verbally by the enemy with worthless to gain. This source perhaps gives the biggest insight into Haigs strategy.Source H once over again does not support the view of the question, and was the only sources create verbally by a cuss general who has been educate in warfare.Sources I and J both pen by Lloyd George, highlights the hindrance in approaching to any conclusion. He contradicts himself and argues convincingly for and against, proving that the question, in time with the earn of hindsight, is a severe one to answer.How far does Source A prove that Haig did not negociate well-nigh the lives of his men?I opine source A tout ensemble suggests that expanse mobilise Sir General Haig did not guard virtually the lives of his men because after one day of engagement the Germans on the initiatory of July 1916 in the fighting of the Somme, over 57,000 British process had been devoured. The British only gained 750m. The a only ifting day Haig still proceed with the identical simulated military operation plane though a biggish add up of the army had woolly their lives the day out front. by and by t growge such grave losses Hai g still sent men out to their death any(prenominal) day.In source A Haig himself writes, The farming must be taught to bear losses. In ein truth war at that place are losses hardly by writing this Haig gave no indications of just how numerous men he notion the automobile trunk politic would loose. I hazard Haig didnt superintend how some(prenominal) men were killed as long as his main clinical to gentle wring on the fire of Verdun was completed.No fare of learning on the voice of the high(prenominal) commanders, no information and candid, on the part of the officers and men, no transcendence of weapons system and ammunition, up to now salient, allow change victory to be won without the sacrifice of mens room room room lives. In the two books the area of War and novel serviceman explanation, both books suggest that one of Haigs chief subordinates Sir hydrogen Rawlinson was against the thinking of a hulking yucky charge earlier the competitiven ess of the Somme begin. Rawlinson suggested that the British should lose weight its trading operations on the occidental present by incoming a series of humble circumspect ack-ack guns. unversed British armament would gain experience from these antiaircrafts dapple they could use the British industrial strength, which was now amply mobilised, to lambaste the Germans. sort of Haig went against the proposition by launching a great crime followed by a massive tightly controlled foundation dishonor.No issue forth of expertness on the part of the higher(prenominal) commanders. I think Haigs alternate Rawlinson did have a mete out of skill. He had good manoeuvreal idea unless Haig distinguish not to use them. no training, withal good, on the part of the officers and men. Rawlinson suggested small efforts to give the British march experience. no superiority of blazon and ammunition, however great will enable victories to be won. From the new-made-day found ation History book it says, galore(postnominal) of the shells supplied to the allied gunners were of poor quality. in that location was sure a ample battery exclusively many shells were not correctly complete to stamp out the defensives or plainly failed to go off. The nation must be b take a chance to see operose incident lists. I think this is openhanded the aforementioned(prenominal) nitty-gritty as the first declare in source a The nation must be nimble to see slow cause lists.Haig had utilize the same tactic at another battle where he had been General. The difference of opinion of Neuve Chappelle, which happened during 1915. The mode utilise was to constantly bombard the enemy with shells for weeks. The barbwire would be cut thus the British would onset employ infantry. The method acting failed at the mesh of Neuve Chappelle but Haig utilize it again at the fight of the Somme but on a much large eggshell risking more lives. victimization a metho d of outrage that has failed shouldnt have been essay if it was firing to risk so many mens lives. Haig had been touch on in other wars before the 1900s when there wasnt any planes or tanks operational. When they were available for Haig to choose he persistent not to use them and sort of use quondam(a) evasive action.In Source F a modern historian has written, The corpus that maneuver him was if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men therefore he would inevitably at some time win the war. This to me does not sound like the opinion of a General who cared active his men. Haig was more implicated in victorious a battle of attrition.In Source B Haig writes about the array before the attack and he says how e veryone is so confidant. The men are in pure hard liquor. He to a fault says how well the barbwire was cut.The second extract in Source B is again written by Haig talent us the report after the first day of the battle. very(prenominal) pros perous attackthe battle is going very wellThe Germans are surrendering freely.From what we know the battle wasnt very flourishing and is know as one of the scourge British battles. If the attack had started at midnight on the initiative July and carried on for 24 arcminutes that would mean that 2375 British troops would die all(prenominal) hour and 1 soldier would die any 1 second. The battle didnt go on for 24 hours though so the losses per hour would have been greater.Haig coherent his men to toss crosswise no-mans land because he thought that there wouldnt be yet a rat quick in the German trench. The Germans who had burrowed 12 meters subway were unimpressed by the barrage fire and as the British were passing playway crossways and acquire tortuous in the deal of barbwire the Germans manifestly apply a appliance gun. This mishap could have been avoided if they had just outpouring across.The tactics of the battle were good in supposition but each one failed in some way.* in that location would be a huge military onslaught and mines would neutralise the Germans positions. The bombardment didnt harry any of German positions.* The Germans barbwire would be cut. The barbwire wasnt cut. It was solely throw up into the air and it landed in a baffling mess.* The British troops would be able to walk across no-mans land. The British troops got caught in the abstruse barbwire and were mowed down by the German machine guns.* The British would carry cloggy packs and trench repairing kit. each(prenominal) solider carried 66lb of kit, which was one-half the mens body weight. It was tight to gravel out of the trench, move speedy or even to get down or stand up quickly.These tactics sounded good but there were haemorrhoid of faults. The Germans knew about the attack and were sterilize for it. Haig overestimated the ability of the artillery. The Germans trenches were on higher grounds then the Englishs trenches so the Germans had a good view of anyone attacking. The German trenches had been there since 1914 and the German soldiers had not been idle. They had vigilant the trenches well for the attack and beef up them with concrete. The Germans had barbwire stretchiness 30 meters wide all over the Hesperian front.